If you’re a dog parent, chances are, you are looking for the best way to keep your furry friend healthy and happy… just like we are. You might be considering adding supplements to your dog's diet, but with so many options out there, it can be overwhelming to decide between natural and synthetic supplements. Here's what you need to know: Natural supplements are derived from plant-based sources and offer a wider range of nutrients, while synthetic supplements are made in a lab and have higher potency and consistency. Both have their pros and cons, so it's important to consult with your veterinarian to determine the best option for your pup's unique needs, but read on to learn more to be more informed to make the best possible decision for your unique pet.
Natural Supplements for Dogs:
Natural supplements for dogs are derived from plant-based sources and often include vitamins, minerals, and herbal extracts. The main advantage of natural supplements is that they are derived from whole food sources, which means they often contain a wider range of nutrients compared to synthetic options.
One study found that natural supplements containing turmeric and omega-3 fatty acids improved mobility and reduced inflammation in dogs with osteoarthritis (1). Additionally, some herbal supplements, such as milk thistle, have been shown to support liver health in dogs (2).
However, natural supplements can also have their drawbacks. One concern is the potential for contamination with harmful substances, such as heavy metals and pesticides, which can be present in the plants used to make the supplements. Additionally, the potency of natural supplements can vary based on the quality of the source material and manufacturing process.
Synthetic Supplements for Dogs:
Synthetic supplements are made in a lab and are designed to mimic the structure of naturally occurring nutrients. The main advantage of synthetic supplements is that they often have higher potency and consistency compared to natural options.
A study found that synthetic glucosamine and chondroitin supplements improved joint function and reduced pain in dogs with osteoarthritis (3). Additionally, synthetic supplements are often more affordable than natural options, which can be a significant factor for pet owners on a budget.
However, synthetic supplements also have their downsides. One issue is that some synthetic nutrients can be less bioavailable or not as easily absorbed by the body compared to their natural counterparts. There is also concern that some synthetic supplements may not have the same long-term benefits as natural options.
Which Option is Best for Your Dog?
When deciding between natural and synthetic supplements, it's essential to consider your dog's specific needs and consult with your veterinarian. In some cases, a combination of both natural and synthetic supplements may be the best option.
It's also important to choose high-quality supplements made by reputable companies and follow the recommended dosage. Keep in mind that supplements should be used in conjunction with a balanced diet and regular exercise to support your dog's overall health.
In conclusion, both natural and synthetic supplements can be beneficial for dogs, but they have their pros and cons. Natural supplements offer a wider range of nutrients, but can have potential contamination issues, while synthetic supplements offer higher potency and consistency but may be less bioavailable. Consult with your veterinarian to determine the best option for your dog's specific needs and choose high-quality supplements from reputable companies.
References:
- Colitti, M., Gaspardo, B., Della Pria, A., Scaini, C., Stefanon, B., & Gabai, G. (2017). Transcriptome and metabolome analysis of dogs with osteoarthritis treated with turmeric extract, omega-3 fatty acids, and hyaluronic acid. PLoS One, 12(10), e0186302.
- Harris, C. M., & Twedt, D. C. (2006). Hepatoprotective effects of Silymarin in dogs. Veterinary Therapeutics, 7(1), 61-73.
- McCarthy, G., O'Donovan, J., Jones, B., McAllister, H., Seed, M., Mooney, C., & Wills, T. (2007). Randomised double‐blind, positive
